Flight Details
Aircraft Type: Boeing 737-823 Operator: American Airlines Registration: N948NN Flight Number: AA2746 Route: Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), California to Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW), Texas Date of Incident: 15 April 2025 Total Occupants: Not publicly disclosed; typical configuration for AA’s 737-800 is 160–172 passengers with 6 crew Weather Conditions: Visual meteorological conditions; no turbulence or adverse weather reported at time of departure
Introduction
On 15 April 2025, an American Airlines Boeing 737-800 operating flight AA2746 was forced to return to Los Angeles International Airport after the crew reported severe vibrations in the right-hand engine during climb. The aircraft had departed from runway 25R and was climbing through FL240 when the issue was declared. Emergency services were placed on standby as the aircraft performed a safe return and landed on runway 25L approximately 50 minutes after departure. The incident has been classified as an engine-related in-flight malfunction involving vibration anomalies.
Sequence of Events
Flight AA2746 departed Los Angeles as scheduled on a routine transcontinental service to Dallas/Fort Worth. The aircraft was climbing normally through the mid-20,000-foot range when the flight crew identified abnormal vibrations associated with the number two (right-hand) CFM56-7B engine.
Upon detection of the vibration, the crew discontinued the climb at FL240 and advised air traffic control of the engine issue. ATC responded with priority handling, and the crew began preparations for a return to Los Angeles.
The nature of the vibration was not detailed publicly, but its severity was significant enough to warrant an immediate diversion. The engine was not reported to have failed or shut down in-flight, but tower communications referred to the situation as a “right-hand engine failure,” likely as a precautionary classification to emergency responders.
The aircraft was vectored back to LAX, where it performed a stable approach and landed without further incident on runway 25L. The aircraft taxied off the runway and was met by airport emergency crews, although no intervention was required.
Crew & Communication
The flight crew acted promptly upon recognition of engine abnormality. Communications with air traffic control remained clear, and while there was no declaration of a Mayday or squawk 7700, the situation was treated with heightened urgency due to the possibility of progressing engine failure.
The crew did not report any visible smoke or fire but referenced engine vibrations consistent with possible internal imbalance or fan/compressor disruption. Checklist procedures for engine vibration and abnormal indications would have been initiated during the descent and return.
Coordination with LAX tower ensured runway assignment and standby emergency services, reflecting proper adherence to FAA and company policy in managing engine-related anomalies.
Aircraft Systems & Technical Analysis
The Boeing 737-800 involved in the event was powered by two CFM56-7B26 engines, a high-bypass turbofan design with an excellent track record for reliability. Engine vibration, when exceeding certain limits, can be indicative of several possible faults:
Fan blade imbalance or damage Compressor stall or surge Bearing or shaft misalignment Foreign object ingestion Sensor malfunction triggering false vibration indication
The right engine remained operational during the event, as no shutdown or thrust loss was reported. The decision to return likely stemmed from persistent vibration levels exceeding manufacturer tolerance thresholds or from erratic engine parameter readings that created uncertainty in engine integrity.
Maintenance crews at LAX will conduct a full inspection, including fan blade tracking, engine borescope examination, and vibration data review from the aircraft’s ACMS (Aircraft Condition Monitoring System).
The aircraft remained on the ground after landing, pending inspection and resolution.
Passenger Experience & Cabin Conditions
There were no reports of cabin disturbances or injuries. While the engine vibration may have been perceptible to passengers seated near the wing or rear fuselage, there were no indications of cabin depressurisation, fire, or other emergency symptoms.
Standard passenger briefing protocols were likely followed during the return. Cabin crew would have been informed by the cockpit and reassured passengers as the aircraft made its way back to Los Angeles.
Passenger disembarkation occurred normally after landing.
Emergency Response & Aftermath
Emergency services were notified by LAX tower in anticipation of a precautionary landing. Fire and rescue vehicles were positioned alongside runway 25L during the approach. Following a safe landing and taxi, emergency personnel confirmed there was no smoke, fire, or fluid leak from the affected engine.
The aircraft was towed or taxied to a designated remote stand for post-flight inspection. Runway operations at LAX continued without disruption.
American Airlines coordinated maintenance and passenger reaccommodation procedures following the return. Passengers were rebooked on later flights to Dallas/Fort Worth.
Investigation Status
The Federal Aviation Administration is expected to document the occurrence as a mechanical in-flight issue, but it does not currently meet the threshold for NTSB investigation absent structural failure, fire, or loss of power.
American Airlines’ internal technical operations team will analyse engine data, review recent maintenance logs, and investigate any open Minimum Equipment List (MEL) items related to engine systems or sensors.
The outcome of the engine inspection will determine whether the vibration was caused by mechanical imbalance, foreign object ingestion, or false indications. If significant hardware damage is discovered, a formal SDR (Service Difficulty Report) will be filed.
Root Cause & Contributing Factors
Root cause has not been confirmed. Probable contributors under current consideration include:
Blade imbalance due to undetected foreign object impact Minor bearing wear or shaft misalignment creating harmonic vibration Sensor fault or erroneous signal from vibration monitoring system Degradation of a rotating component due to progressive wear
Contributing operational factors may include prior engine runtime cycles, age of the powerplant, or thermal stress in the departure phase.
The crew’s timely action and return decision prevented potential escalation and ensured flight safety.
Safety Recommendations & Industry Impact
While no formal recommendations have been issued, this incident reinforces the necessity of proactive engine monitoring and pilot training in abnormal vibration recognition. Engine vibration monitoring thresholds continue to evolve, and manufacturers may issue advisories when common vibration patterns align with specific mechanical outcomes.
If a component-level fault is identified, CFM International may issue a service bulletin affecting similar engines across the fleet.
American Airlines is expected to complete a root cause analysis and perform fleet-wide trend monitoring for similar events across its 737-800 fleet.
Conclusion
The incident involving American Airlines flight AA2746 on 15 April 2025 demonstrates the value of early anomaly detection and disciplined crew response. Engine vibrations, while sometimes benign, can signify progressive failure or impending component fatigue. The return to Los Angeles was executed professionally, with no passenger injuries or aircraft damage.
As investigations continue, attention will focus on confirming the cause of the vibration and ensuring that operational safeguards and maintenance practices continue to mitigate such risks across the commercial fleet.
Disclaimer
This article is based on publicly available information and reports at the time of writing. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, we cannot guarantee the completeness of the information provided.
If you are the rightful owner of any referenced content or images and wish them to be removed, please contact takedown@cockpitking.com.