Date: 12th May 2010
Location: Near Tripoli International Airport, Libya
Aircraft: Airbus A330-202, registration 5A-ONG
Flight Number: 771
Operator: Afriqiyah Airways
Flight Route: Johannesburg (South Africa) to Tripoli (Libya)
Passengers: 93
Crew: 11
Summary of Events
On 12th May 2010, Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771, an Airbus A330-202, crashed while attempting to land at Tripoli International Airport in Libya. The aircraft was on a scheduled flight from Johannesburg, South Africa, to Tripoli when it crashed during its final approach, killing 103 of the 104 people on board. The sole survivor was a 9-year-old Dutch boy, Ruben van Assouw. The crash left the aviation world stunned, and an investigation was launched to determine the cause of the accident.
The weather at the time of the crash was clear, and visibility was good, making adverse weather an unlikely cause. Initial reports suggested that the aircraft was on a stable approach when it suddenly veered off course, leading to a catastrophic impact with the ground just short of the runway. The aircraft broke apart upon impact, and much of the wreckage was consumed by fire. Rescue teams arrived quickly, but the severity of the crash left little hope for other survivors.
Aircraft and Crew Information
The aircraft involved in the accident was an Airbus A330-202, a wide-body, twin-engine jet designed for long-haul flights. The Airbus A330 is known for its advanced avionics, fly-by-wire technology, and safety features. The aircraft, registration 5A-ONG, had been delivered to Afriqiyah Airways in September 2009, making it relatively new at the time of the crash. With fewer than a year in service, the aircraft was considered to be in excellent condition, and it had accumulated approximately 1,600 flight hours.
Afriqiyah Airways, a Libyan airline founded in 2001, was expanding its international operations, with Tripoli serving as a major hub. The airline had a good safety record prior to the crash of Flight 771.
The flight crew consisted of experienced pilots and cabin staff. The captain had over 17,000 flight hours, with extensive experience flying the Airbus A330. The first officer also had several thousand flight hours, and both pilots were well-trained in handling the A330’s automated systems. The crew had undergone routine training, including emergency procedures and landing approaches, and there were no prior reports of issues with crew performance.
Sequence of Events
Flight 771 departed from Johannesburg’s O.R. Tambo International Airport on the evening of 11th May 2010, bound for Tripoli, Libya, with 93 passengers and 11 crew members on board. The flight was scheduled as part of Afriqiyah Airways’ growing network of international routes. The flight was uneventful throughout its cruise phase, with no reported technical problems or issues related to passenger or crew behaviour.
As the aircraft approached Tripoli, it began its descent in preparation for landing on Runway 09 at Tripoli International Airport. The weather conditions were reported to be clear, with good visibility and no significant wind or turbulence. The approach appeared to be normal until the final moments of the flight.
In the final stages of the approach, the aircraft suddenly veered off course and descended rapidly. Air traffic control (ATC) lost contact with the flight just before impact. The Airbus A330 crashed into the ground approximately 1.2 kilometres from the runway threshold, breaking apart on impact and catching fire. The majority of the wreckage was engulfed in flames, complicating rescue efforts.
Of the 104 people on board, only one person, a 9-year-old Dutch boy, survived. He was found among the wreckage and was transported to a local hospital for treatment. All other passengers and crew members perished in the crash.
Weather Conditions
At the time of the crash, the weather in Tripoli was clear, with no significant clouds, wind, or turbulence. Visibility was reported to be good, and there were no indications of adverse weather that could have contributed to the crash. The clear weather conditions eliminated the possibility of weather-related causes, leading investigators to focus on other factors, such as mechanical failure, crew error, or automation issues.
Investigation and Analysis
The investigation into the crash of Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771 was conducted by the Libyan Civil Aviation Authority (LYCAA), with assistance from international aviation experts, including representatives from Airbus and the French Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety (BEA). The investigation focused on several key factors, including the aircraft’s performance, the actions of the flight crew, and the role of automated flight systems in the crash.
Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT): The investigation concluded that the crash was a case of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), where an aircraft is flown into the ground despite being fully operational. CFIT accidents often occur when pilots lose situational awareness, particularly during approach and landing phases. In the case of Flight 771, the crew appeared to have lost awareness of their altitude and descent rate, leading to the aircraft’s impact with the ground short of the runway.
Automation and Human Factors: The Airbus A330 is equipped with advanced flight management systems (FMS) and autopilot functions, designed to assist pilots in maintaining a stable approach. However, the investigation revealed that the crew may have become overly reliant on the automated systems, leading to a delayed response when the aircraft began to deviate from its approach path. The investigation found that the crew did not take corrective action in time to prevent the crash, suggesting that they may have misinterpreted the aircraft’s descent profile or were distracted by the automated systems.
Crew Fatigue and Performance: Fatigue was also considered a potential factor in the crash. The flight from Johannesburg to Tripoli was an overnight flight, and the crew had been flying for several hours before the accident occurred. Fatigue can impair a pilot’s ability to make critical decisions, particularly during high-pressure situations such as landing. The investigation examined the crew’s work schedule and rest periods in the days leading up to the flight, but no conclusive evidence was found to suggest that fatigue alone caused the crash.
Black Box Analysis: The flight data recorder (FDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR) were recovered from the crash site and analysed by investigators. The data from the FDR showed that the aircraft’s systems were functioning normally until the final moments of the flight. The CVR revealed that the crew had been communicating regularly with ATC and each other but did not indicate any awareness of an imminent crash until just seconds before impact. This supported the theory that the crew may have lost situational awareness during the approach.
Conclusions
The crash of Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771 was attributed to controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), caused by a loss of situational awareness on the part of the flight crew during the final approach to Tripoli International Airport. The investigation found that the aircraft was fully operational and that the weather conditions were clear, ruling out technical or environmental causes. Instead, the crew’s failure to recognise the aircraft’s descent profile and take corrective action in time resulted in the crash.
The investigation also highlighted the potential risks associated with over-reliance on automated flight systems, particularly during critical phases of flight such as approach and landing. While automation can assist pilots in maintaining a stable approach, it is essential that pilots remain vigilant and ready to intervene when necessary.
Recommendations
In light of the findings from the investigation, several key recommendations were made to improve aviation safety and prevent similar accidents in the future:
1. Enhanced Crew Training for Situational Awareness: Airlines should provide additional training for flight crews on maintaining situational awareness during approach and landing. This training should focus on recognising potential deviations from the flight path and responding quickly to prevent CFIT accidents.
2. Automation and Human Factors Training: Flight crews should receive more comprehensive training on the use of automated systems and the potential risks of over-reliance on automation. Pilots must be prepared to disengage the autopilot and manually control the aircraft when necessary.
3. Fatigue Management Programs: Airlines should implement fatigue management programs to ensure that flight crews are well-rested before operating long-haul flights, particularly overnight flights. These programs should include regular monitoring of crew rest periods and work schedules to minimise the risk of fatigue-related errors.
4. Improved Terrain Awareness Systems: While the Airbus A330 is equipped with advanced terrain awareness systems, airlines should continue to update and enhance these systems to provide more accurate warnings of potential terrain hazards. This will give pilots more time to react in cases where the aircraft is descending too rapidly or approaching dangerous terrain.
Safety Lessons and Industry Impact
The crash of Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771 was a devastating reminder of the importance of situational awareness and the need for vigilance during approach and landing. The loss of 103 lives, including many children and families, underscored the risks associated with CFIT accidents and the role of human factors in aviation safety.
Since the crash, airlines around the world have adopted more rigorous training programs for pilots, focusing on automation management, situational awareness, and CFIT prevention. The lessons learned from this tragedy have contributed to significant improvements in global aviation safety standards.
Disclaimer
If you are the rightful owner of the photo and wish it to be taken down, please email takedown@cockpitking.com.
Our investigation reports are based on all the evidence and facts we have at the time of writing and posting. We apologise if any details are missed or are not fully accurate.
