Date: 30th November 2007
Location: Near Keciborlu, Isparta Province, Turkey
Aircraft: McDonnell Douglas MD-83, registration TC-AKM
Flight Number: KK4203
Operator: Atlasjet
Flight Route: Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Turkey) to Isparta Süleyman Demirel Airport (Turkey)
Passengers: 49
Crew: 7
Summary of Events
On 30th November 2007, Atlasjet Flight KK4203, a McDonnell Douglas MD-83, crashed into mountainous terrain near the town of Keciborlu in Isparta Province, Turkey, killing all 56 passengers and crew on board. The flight had departed from Istanbul Atatürk Airport and was en route to Isparta Süleyman Demirel Airport. The aircraft crashed approximately 12 kilometres from its destination while on final approach, in an area of rugged and mountainous terrain.
The cause of the crash was attributed to the crew’s failure to follow the designated approach path, which led to controlled flight into terrain (CFIT). The incident highlighted the risks associated with approach and landing in mountainous regions and emphasized the importance of strict adherence to navigation protocols.
Aircraft and Crew Information
The aircraft involved in the crash was a McDonnell Douglas MD-83, a narrow-body jet commonly used for short- to medium-haul flights. This particular MD-83, registration TC-AKM, had been in service for over 13 years and had accumulated thousands of flight hours. Despite its age, the aircraft was reported to be well-maintained and in compliance with regulatory requirements.
The crew consisted of two experienced pilots and five cabin crew members. The captain had accumulated over 3,000 flight hours, with considerable experience on the MD-80 series. The first officer also had significant flight experience, though with fewer hours on the MD-83 model. Both pilots were qualified to fly the route between Istanbul and Isparta.
Sequence of Events
Flight KK4203 departed from Istanbul Atatürk Airport at approximately 00:50 local time and proceeded on its planned route to Isparta. The flight was uneventful until it neared Isparta’s Süleyman Demirel Airport, where it encountered low visibility and dark conditions over mountainous terrain. The final approach required precise navigation to avoid the high terrain surrounding the airport.
As the aircraft began its descent toward Isparta, it deviated from the standard approach path. Instead of following the designated course, the crew descended prematurely and did not adhere to the established approach procedure. At 01:36 local time, the aircraft impacted a mountainside approximately 12 kilometres from the airport, at an altitude that was below the required safe minimum for the approach.
The crash resulted in the immediate deaths of all 56 passengers and crew members on board. The wreckage was scattered over the mountainous terrain, complicating recovery efforts, which were hampered by the remote location and challenging conditions.
Weather and Runway Conditions
At the time of the crash, weather conditions in the Isparta region included low visibility due to darkness and a slight cloud cover, though no severe weather conditions such as turbulence or strong winds were reported. The runway and approach paths at Isparta were clear of obstructions, and there were no adverse environmental factors that would have prevented a safe landing had the aircraft remained on the designated flight path.
The lack of adverse weather factors directed the investigation toward operational and navigational errors as primary causes of the accident.
Investigation and Analysis
The investigation was led by the Turkish Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), with assistance from McDonnell Douglas and international aviation safety experts. The primary focus of the investigation was on the crew’s actions, the approach path deviation, and potential contributing factors related to human factors and navigation protocols.
Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT): The investigation concluded that the crash resulted from controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), where an airworthy aircraft is unintentionally flown into the ground due to crew misjudgment or navigational error. In this case, the crew descended below the minimum safe altitude for the area, leading the aircraft into high terrain without sufficient visual or instrument reference.
Deviation from Approach Procedure: The investigation found that the crew deviated from the standard approach procedure, failing to adhere to the established approach path that would have kept the aircraft clear of the mountainous terrain. The reasons for this deviation were not entirely clear, but it appeared that the crew may have experienced disorientation or misinterpreted the approach instructions. The aircraft was equipped with a ground proximity warning system (GPWS), but the investigation indicated that it might not have activated in time to prevent the crash.
Human Factors and Situational Awareness: Human factors, particularly the crew’s situational awareness, played a significant role in the accident. The dark conditions over the rugged terrain, combined with the absence of external visual references, may have contributed to spatial disorientation. Additionally, the crew’s deviation from the designated approach and their descent below the minimum safe altitude suggested a breakdown in situational awareness, leading to the fatal error.
Navigation Aids and Airport Infrastructure: The Isparta airport lacked certain advanced navigational aids, such as an instrument landing system (ILS), which could have provided additional guidance during the approach. Although the approach procedure was viable under normal conditions, the lack of enhanced navigational support in the mountainous area may have increased the difficulty of landing safely, especially at night.
Conclusions
The crash of Atlasjet Flight KK4203 was caused by a controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) due to the crew’s deviation from the standard approach procedure and a loss of situational awareness. The dark conditions, lack of external visual references, and possible disorientation contributed to the crew’s misjudgment of altitude and distance from the airport. The failure to follow the designated approach path led the aircraft into the mountainous area surrounding the airport, resulting in the tragic loss of all lives on board.
The incident underscored the importance of strict adherence to approach and landing procedures, particularly in challenging environments with limited navigational aids. It also highlighted the need for effective situational awareness and decision-making training for crews operating in difficult terrain.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the investigation, the following recommendations were made to improve aviation safety and prevent similar incidents in the future:
1. Enhanced Training for Approach Procedures in Mountainous Terrain: Airlines should provide additional training for crews on navigating challenging approaches in mountainous areas, emphasizing the importance of following designated approach paths and maintaining situational awareness in low-visibility conditions.
2. Implementation of Additional Navigational Aids at Isparta Airport: The Turkish DGCA should consider installing advanced navigational aids, such as an instrument landing system (ILS) or improved visual aids, at Isparta Airport to support safer approaches in low-visibility and night-time conditions.
3. Crew Resource Management (CRM) and Situational Awareness Training: Airlines should reinforce CRM and situational awareness training to help crews avoid CFIT incidents. This includes training on the risks of descent below safe altitudes and the importance of verifying approach paths in challenging environments.
4. Installation of Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning Systems (EGPWS): Operators of aircraft flying in mountainous regions should be encouraged to install Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning Systems (EGPWS) that offer more reliable terrain warnings, particularly in areas without ILS or other precision guidance systems.
Safety Lessons and Industry Impact
The crash of Atlasjet Flight KK4203 emphasized the critical importance of situational awareness and adherence to navigational protocols during approaches, especially in regions with challenging terrain. The lessons from this tragic event have since influenced training programs across the aviation industry, focusing on CFIT prevention, CRM, and decision-making in low-visibility conditions.
The accident also highlighted the value of having adequate navigational aids at airports in mountainous areas, prompting discussions about infrastructure improvements at similar airports to ensure safer operations.
Disclaimer
If you are the rightful owner of the photo and wish it to be taken down, please email takedown@cockpitking.com.
Our investigation reports are based on all the evidence and facts we have at the time of writing and posting. We apologise if any details are missed or are not fully accurate.
