Date: 12th February 2009
Location: Clarence Center, near Buffalo, New York, USA
Aircraft: Bombardier DHC-8-402 (Q400), registration N200WQ
Flight Number: 3407
Operator: Colgan Air (operating as Continental Connection)
Flight Route: Newark (New Jersey) to Buffalo (New York)
Passengers: 45
Crew: 4
Ground Casualties: 1
Summary of Events
On 12th February 2009, Colgan Air Flight 3407, a Bombardier Q400 turboprop aircraft, crashed into a house in Clarence Center, near Buffalo, New York, while on approach to Buffalo Niagara International Airport. All 49 people on board the aircraft were killed, along with one person on the ground. The aircraft was operating as a regional flight from Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey to Buffalo, New York, under the Continental Connection brand.
The crash occurred during the aircraft’s final approach in icy conditions. An investigation later revealed that the pilots’ improper response to the activation of the aircraft’s stall warning system, combined with fatigue and insufficient training, led to the fatal loss of control. The crash of Flight 3407 was the deadliest U.S. aviation accident in nearly a decade and led to significant changes in aviation safety regulations, particularly regarding pilot training and fatigue management.
Aircraft and Crew Information
The aircraft involved in the crash was a Bombardier DHC-8-402 Q400, a twin-engine turboprop designed for short- to medium-haul flights. The Q400 is commonly used by regional carriers due to its ability to operate efficiently on shorter routes while providing a comfortable cabin experience for passengers. The aircraft, registration N200WQ, had been in service since 2008 and had accumulated approximately 2,200 flight hours.
Colgan Air, a regional carrier operating flights on behalf of major airlines, operated the flight under the Continental Connection brand. The airline provided regional services to smaller airports that feed into larger hubs operated by Continental Airlines.
The flight crew consisted of two pilots, both of whom were experienced but faced scrutiny regarding their training and rest periods following the crash. The captain, aged 47, had over 3,000 flight hours, with around 1,100 hours on the Q400. The first officer, aged 24, had accumulated around 2,200 flight hours but had only 774 hours on the Q400. Both pilots were qualified to operate the aircraft, but concerns about their level of fatigue and handling of in-flight emergencies were highlighted during the investigation.
Sequence of Events
Flight 3407 departed from Newark Liberty International Airport at 21:18 EST, bound for Buffalo. The flight proceeded uneventfully for most of the journey, with the aircraft reaching its cruising altitude of 16,000 feet before beginning its descent toward Buffalo Niagara International Airport. As the aircraft approached Buffalo, weather conditions deteriorated, with reports of light snow, moderate turbulence, and potential icing conditions.
At approximately 22:16 EST, while the aircraft was descending through 2,300 feet, the flight crew extended the flaps and landing gear in preparation for landing. Moments later, the aircraft’s stall warning system activated, including the stick shaker, which is designed to warn pilots of an impending aerodynamic stall. Instead of applying the correct stall recovery procedure—pushing the nose down and adding power to regain airspeed—the captain pulled back on the control column, which worsened the situation.
The aircraft entered an aerodynamic stall, lost altitude rapidly, and became uncontrollable. At 22:17 EST, just one minute after the stall warning was triggered, Flight 3407 crashed into a house in Clarence Center, New York, approximately 6 miles from Buffalo Niagara International Airport. The impact caused a fire that destroyed the home, killing one person inside. All 49 people on board the aircraft also perished.
Weather and Conditions
At the time of the crash, the weather in the Buffalo area was deteriorating, with light snow and moderate turbulence reported. Icing conditions were present, which can affect the performance of aircraft by reducing lift and increasing drag on the wings. While icing was a factor in the stall warning activation, the aircraft’s de-icing systems were functioning properly, and the crew should have been able to recover from the situation had proper procedures been followed.
The presence of icing conditions required the flight crew to be vigilant, but the investigation found that their response to the stall warning was inappropriate, contributing to the loss of control.
Investigation and Analysis
The investigation into the crash of Colgan Air Flight 3407 was led by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and focused on several key areas, including crew performance, icing conditions, and the aircraft’s stall warning system.
Crew Response and Stall Recovery: The NTSB determined that the primary cause of the crash was the crew’s improper response to the activation of the stall warning system. When the stick shaker activated, warning of an impending stall, the captain pulled back on the control column, which exacerbated the situation. The correct procedure in a stall is to lower the nose to regain airspeed, but the captain’s actions caused the aircraft to enter a deeper stall. The first officer also failed to challenge the captain’s incorrect response, reflecting a breakdown in cockpit resource management (CRM).
Pilot Fatigue: The investigation revealed that both pilots were likely fatigued at the time of the crash. The captain had commuted from Florida to Newark the day of the flight, and the first officer had commuted overnight from Seattle. Fatigue can impair decision-making, reaction times, and situational awareness, and the NTSB concluded that fatigue likely played a role in the crew’s inadequate response to the stall warning.
Icing and Aircraft Performance: While icing conditions were present during the approach, the NTSB determined that the aircraft’s de-icing systems were functioning as designed and were not a direct cause of the crash. However, the presence of ice on the wings may have contributed to the activation of the stall warning by affecting the aircraft’s performance. The crew’s failure to handle the situation correctly, rather than the icing itself, was the main factor in the crash.
Training and Experience: The investigation also highlighted deficiencies in Colgan Air’s pilot training program, particularly with regard to stall recovery procedures. The NTSB found that the training provided to pilots on handling stalls at high altitudes and during approach was inadequate. Additionally, the first officer’s inexperience in dealing with in-flight emergencies, combined with her reluctance to challenge the captain’s actions, contributed to the breakdown in CRM.
Conclusions
The crash of Colgan Air Flight 3407 was primarily caused by the flight crew’s improper response to the activation of the stall warning system. The crew’s failure to follow proper stall recovery procedures led the aircraft into an aerodynamic stall from which they could not recover. Contributing factors included pilot fatigue, insufficient training, and poor cockpit communication during the emergency.
The incident also highlighted broader issues within the regional airline industry, particularly regarding pilot training, experience, and rest regulations. The crash resulted in significant changes to U.S. aviation regulations and served as a catalyst for improvements in safety standards across the industry.
Recommendations
Following the investigation, the NTSB made several key recommendations aimed at improving aviation safety and preventing similar accidents:
1. Enhanced Stall Recovery Training: Airlines should improve their stall recovery training programs, ensuring that pilots are fully trained on how to respond to stall warnings at all stages of flight. This training should include both theoretical instruction and hands-on simulation exercises.
2. Fatigue Management Programs: Airlines should adopt more stringent fatigue management programs, ensuring that pilots have adequate rest before operating flights. Commuting long distances before a shift should be discouraged, and pilots should be provided with better access to rest facilities.
3. Improved Cockpit Resource Management (CRM): Training programs should place a greater emphasis on CRM, ensuring that first officers feel empowered to challenge captains when necessary. Effective communication between crew members is essential during in-flight emergencies.
4. Icing Awareness and Procedures: While icing was not the direct cause of the crash, the presence of icing conditions should prompt greater vigilance from flight crews. Airlines should continue to provide training on how to manage icing conditions and respond to performance changes during flight.
Safety Lessons and Industry Impact
The crash of Colgan Air Flight 3407 was a pivotal moment in U.S. aviation history, leading to significant changes in safety regulations. The accident prompted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to introduce new rules regarding pilot training, flight and duty time, and rest requirements, aimed at reducing the risk of fatigue-related incidents.
The crash also led to increased scrutiny of the regional airline industry, with calls for higher standards in training and operational practices. Since the incident, airlines have implemented more robust training programs for stall recovery and CRM, helping to prevent similar accidents in the future.
The legacy of Flight 3407 continues to influence aviation safety, ensuring that the lessons learned from this tragedy are applied to make air travel safer for all.
Disclaimer
If you are the rightful owner of the photo and wish it to be taken down, please email takedown@cockpitking.com.
Our investigation reports are based on all the evidence and facts we have at the time of writing and posting. We apologise if any details are missed or are not fully accurate.
