A VietJet Air Airbus A321-200 was forced to initiate an emergency descent and declare a Mayday over the South China Sea on 3 May 2025 after the crew reported a cracked windshield at cruising altitude. The aircraft diverted safely to Kaohsiung, Taiwan, where it remains grounded pending detailed inspection and repair.
Flight Overview
Operator: VietJet Air Flight Number: VJ881 Aircraft Type: Airbus A321-211 Registration: VN-A642 Engines: 2 × IAE V2533-A5 Route: Seoul Incheon (RKSI) to Da Nang (VVDN) Date: 3 May 2025 Occupants: Not publicly disclosed (typical capacity: ~220) Incident Location: Approx. 50 NM south of Kaohsiung FIR at FL340 Emergency Declaration: Mayday Diversion Airport: Kaohsiung International (RCKH) Runway Used: 09 Landing Time: Approx. 40 minutes after descent initiated Current Aircraft Status: Grounded at Kaohsiung for inspection (>19 hours as of last update)
Sequence of Events
Cruise Phase: Sudden Windshield Damage
Flight VJ881 was enroute from Incheon (Seoul), South Korea to Da Nang, Vietnam, cruising at FL340 over the South China Sea in Taiwanese FIR when the crew reported a windshield crack in the forward flight deck.
At approximately 50 nautical miles south of Kaohsiung, the crew declared Mayday with ATC, urgently requesting descent clearance:
“We have a cracked windshield. Request descend to flight level 150 now.”
This communication indicated a potentially critical pressurisation or structural concern, prompting ATC to immediately prioritise the aircraft’s descent path. The crew subsequently initiated an emergency descent, reducing altitude from FL340 to FL150 and below.
Descent rates in such scenarios are typically around 2,500 to 4,000 feet per minute, executed with idle thrust and full speed brakes, while maintaining controlled cabin pressure differentials.
Windshield Construction and Risk Assessment
The A321 cockpit windshield consists of a multi-layered, chemically strengthened, electrically heated panel made from laminated glass and stretched acrylic, bonded using interlayers for structural integrity and thermal performance. Each flight deck windshield is a load-bearing structure and is classified as fail-safe under EASA and FAA certification criteria.
Each windshield comprises:
Outer Ply: Protective, exposed to atmospheric and thermal stress Middle Ply: Primary structural element Inner Ply: Cabin-facing, maintains cabin pressure integrity
A crack in the outer ply, while potentially alarming, is non-structural and does not typically result in depressurisation. However, failure of the middle or inner ply can compromise pressurisation integrity or trigger disbonding and delamination, posing a significant safety risk.
Due to the high speeds and differential pressure (~8 psi at FL340), even a suspected degradation of one ply warrants immediate descent.
Emergency Descent and Holding
Upon reaching lower altitudes, the crew descended further to 3,000 feet, entering a holding pattern near Kaohsiung to coordinate landing sequence and allow time for visual inspection of the damage, system monitoring, and emergency services deployment.
At this point, standard checklist actions for “Cracked Windshield” would include:
Heating system isolation (if not automatically disengaged) Visual assessment of crack propagation Cabin pressure monitoring Checklist review for any Secondary Flight Deck Window Damage
Windshield heating systems, designed to prevent icing and fogging, can exacerbate crack propagation if faults occur in resistive heating layers. Isolating windshield heat is a key step to prevent worsening damage.
Safe Landing at Kaohsiung
The aircraft proceeded to land on runway 09 at Kaohsiung (RCKH) under VMC conditions. The landing was described as smooth and uneventful. The aircraft vacated the runway and taxied under escort to a designated stand where engineering teams and fire crews awaited.
No evacuation was deemed necessary. There were no reported injuries, and passengers disembarked via jetbridge.
Aircraft and Operational Background
Airframe: VN-A642 Airbus A321-200 (ceo) Delivered: 2016 Powerplants: IAE V2533-A5 engines Seating: All-economy, approx. 220 passengers Operational Role: Medium-haul SE Asia routes
VietJet’s A321 fleet serves high-frequency regional routes across Southeast Asia and Northeast Asia. VN-A642 has been in service for over 9 years and had no known recent maintenance events suggesting prior windshield irregularities.
Windshield structural defects are rare but have been documented across Airbus and Boeing fleets. Contributing factors can include:
Thermal stress cycling Manufacturing adhesion flaws Localized impact or FOD Electrical arcing or heating grid imbalance
Post-Landing Actions and Investigation
As of 19 hours post-incident, VN-A642 remains grounded at Kaohsiung International Airport. VietJet maintenance personnel, supported by Airbus AOG (Aircraft On Ground) field engineering, are conducting full diagnostics. These include:
Visual inspection of windshield inner, middle, and outer layers Bond integrity checks using tap tests and non-destructive methods Electrical continuity testing of heating elements Cockpit pressurisation checks for leakage or seal damage Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Central Maintenance System (CMS) download for correlated warnings or system faults
If crack propagation was limited to the outer ply, only replacement of the outer pane may be required. However, if inner structural plies are compromised, full windshield assembly replacement will be mandated.
Windshield replacement is a high-complexity maintenance action requiring:
Specialized lifting jigs Adhesive bonding cure cycles Seal integrity testing Electrical reconnection of heating and sensors
Repair time could exceed 24–36 hours depending on parts availability and workshop clearance.
Pressurisation and Structural Safety
Although no decompression occurred, cracked windshields at high altitudes pose serious potential safety risks, particularly in relation to:
Rapid decompression if multiple plies fail Windshield panel disbonding Flight deck exposure to external temperatures (-55°C at cruise) Distraction or injury from shattering glass or displaced panels
Airbus’s structural fail-safe design is intended to ensure continued safe flight with an outer pane crack, but conservative operational procedures dictate immediate descent and diversion regardless of the affected layer.
Conclusion
The VietJet A321 windshield crack event on 3 May 2025 exemplifies the high-priority safety protocols surrounding flight deck structural transparency failures. While modern airliner windshields are designed to be fault-tolerant, even outer pane fractures require rapid response due to the dynamic thermal, pressure, and aerodynamic loads applied at cruise altitudes.
The crew’s immediate Mayday declaration, request for descent, and safe diversion to Kaohsiung reflect disciplined application of Airbus abnormal procedures and airspace coordination. The uneventful landing and calm passenger management further highlight the professionalism of VietJet’s flight and ground personnel.
Pending results of technical inspection and maintenance action, the aircraft will remain out of service. No injury occurred, and the event has been reported to Vietnamese and Taiwanese aviation authorities for formal classification and review.
Disclaimer
This article is based on publicly available information and reports at the time of writing. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, we cannot guarantee the completeness of the information provided.
If you are the rightful owner of any referenced content or images and wish them to be removed, please contact takedown@cockpitking.com.
